To Treat or Not To Treat Water?
That is the Question.
http://www.geocities.com/jormabio/archi ve/watertreatornot.html
THM’s; Trihalomethanes; Chlorination By-Products (CBP's)
1,2-dichloroethane, see link http://193.51.164.11/htdocs/monogra phs/Vol71/015-dichloretha.html
dichloromethane (side issue; solvent residue of decaffienated coffee)
chloroform(trichloromethane) CHCl3
bromoform CHBr3
bromodichloromethane CHCl2Br
dibromochloromethane CHClBr2
They are Cancer Group B carcinogens (shown to cause cancer in laboratory animals.
Trichloromethane (chloroform) is by far the most common in most water systems. Dibromochloromethane is the most serious cancer risk, (0.6 ug/l to cause a 10-6 cancer risk increase) followed in order by Bromoform (4 ug/l), and Chloroform (6 ug/l). Current regulations limit the concentration of these 4 chemicals added together (total trihalomethane or TTHM levels) to 100 ug/l.
Kenneth P. Cantor et.al. Dec 1987 JNCI [ found that people who drank 8 cups of chlorinated tap water for 40-59 years had a 40% greater risk of bladder cancer than those who drank less tap water or unchlorinated water. People who drank 8 cups of chlorinated tap water for 60 or more years had an 80% greater risk of bladder cancer]
[Q. What about levels of solvent residues in coffee - are there laws about this? Under EU law, dicloromethane residue levels in decaffeinated coffee must be under 2 parts per million. For ethyl acetate and carbon dioxide there are no legislative restrictions in most countries.]
One way to decrease THM's is to eliminate or reduce chlorination before the filters and to reduce precursors. There are more precursors present before filtration, so we want to reduce or eliminate the time chlorine is in contact with this water.
If some oxidation before filtration is required, an alternative disinfectant like potassium permanganate or peroxide could be considered. Note that this may not be an option if prechlorination is necessary to achieve required CT values.
The EPA has indicated that the best available technology for THM control at treatment plants is removal of precursors through "enhanced coagulation".
Enhanced coagulation refers to the process of optimizing the filtration process to maximize removal of precursors.
Removal is improved by decreasing pH (to levels as low as 4 or 5), increasing the feed rate of coagulants, and possibly using ferric coagulants instead of alum.
For point of use systems at homes, activated carbon filters are the most effective treatment. Reverse osmosis units will also eliminate trihalomethanes.
HAA CBP's; Haloacetic acids;
monobromoacetic acid
dibromoacetic acid
monochloroacetic acid
dichloroacetic acid
trichloroacetic acid
Bromates; Ozonation Disinfection By-Products (DBP's)
Ozonation, is expensive and in salty water can produce other carcinogens, bromates. Treatment with ozone causes few DBPs but does result in the production of bromate when used in water with high bromine concentrations. Bromate has been shown in studies by the EPA to cause mesotheliomas in rats and kidney tumors in both rats and mice. In addition, oral exposures to potassium bromate have been shown to cause renal cancer in rats.
Chloramination; and DBP's
Or some combine chlorine withammonia in a disinfection method called chloramination.
Chloramines are composed of three chemicals formed when chlorine and ammonia-nitrogen are combined in water. In high doses chloramines cause blood and liver damage in laboratory animals. Monochloramine is preferred because of its biocidal properties and minimal taste and odor. Monochloramine is created by controlling the chlorine-to-ammonia ratio to a value generally less than 5:1 by weight or 1:1 on a molar basis.
The Chloramines are:
monochloramine (NH2Cl)
dichloramine (NHCl2)
trichloramine, nitrogen trichloride (NCl3).
Chloramination DBP's Summary; definitely some toxins, carcinogens
Nitrification
Blue-green algal blooms, if water temps high
Chloramines also have been found to produce total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
bromodichloromethane
chlorodibromomethane
bromoform
dihaloacetic acids poorly controlled under some conditions (HAAs).
dichloroacetic acid causes cancer in rodents
dissolved organic halogen poorly controlled under some conditions
Research results imply that many unreported DBPs are created by chloramines.
two-step microbial process, ammonia is converted to nitrite and then to nitrate. The intermediate stage-nitrite--depletes the chloramine residual and increases heterotrophic bacteria.
nitrite
nitrate (two-headed fish in hatcheries)
haloacetonitriles
mutagen X, (MX)
Impending Regulations
The EPA is considering extensive revisions to the regulations covering disinfection by-products (DBP's).
The limit for TTHM's would be lowered to 80 ug/l, and three additional categories of DBP's . This standard will replace the current standard of a maximum allowable annual average level of 100 parts per billion in December 2001 for large surface water public water systems. [Canada uses 100 ppb]. The standard will become effective for the first time in December 2003 for small surface water and all ground water systems.
An MCL for total haloacetic acids of 60 ug/l is expected. Potential nervous system and liver effects.
Chlorite is to be regulated with an MCL set at 1 mg/l (1 ppm). Excessive levels linked to hemolytic anemia.
Bromate, the other newly regulated DBP , is a concern only for systems using ozone. An MCL of 10 ug/l is expected. Excessive levels causes gastrointestinal, kidney, and hearing effects.
Data Gaps….I haven't had time to fill these. Busy with life.
Reproductive toxicity.
Robert Chapin, a reproductive toxicologist in the Laboratory of Toxicology, is responsible for studies on 10 compounds identified as high priorities by the EPA: the THMs bromodichloromethane and chlorodibromomethane; the HAAs bromochloroacetic acid, dibromochloroacetic acid, and tribromoacetic acid; the haloacetonitriles bromoacetonitrile and dibromoacetonitrile; hexachloropropanone (a member of a lesser class of DBPs called the haloketones); sodium bromate; and a mixture of mono-, di-, and trichloroacetic acids, mono- and dibromoacetic acids, and bromochloroacetic acid (all HAAs). Long-term rodent carcinogenicity studies are being developed for six compounds under Boorman and one compound (MX)
H2O Treatment LINKS
http://www.awwarf.com/research/apps/chl oram.htm
http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2 000/108-2/niehsnews.html
Terminology used in water management and treatment link.
http://wilkes.edu/~eqc/glossary.htm
Water Quality Table link
http://www.eastgr.org/ccrtable.htm
For a neat regulatory package check this link. We Pay $16.95 to see Canadian guidelines; Indonesia=FREE!
Water Purity Regulation in Indonesia; Transparancy
Pesticides in Drinking Water
Violations in the USA
http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/wot/howsafe.ht ml
Calculating Maximum Pesticide Levels in Drinking Water
EPA table of Maximum Concentrations of Organic Chemicals in Drinking Water
My Conclusion
I am leaning towards reverse osmosis or activated charcoal or untreated pure water from a known tested healthy source like rain or a mountain spring. These may not be fool-proof either. One has to know their water.
Some countries fluoridate their water purportedly to provide drinkers with better teeth. I would expect fluoride to behave like these other halogens, chlorine and bromine, and generate a similar class of carcinogens and related byproducts. The reader should search the literature if they are curious about this. I have heard that fluoridation in the USA causes 10,000 additional cancer deaths per year. I do not recall the reference. Over-dosing is very likely for diebetics who drink large volumes of water and they are at special risk if it is added to the water. Fluoride is present in a balanced diet so one has to wonder why the health authorities wouldn't rather simply promote a balanced diet rather than fluoridate the water.
To sort through the health effects puzzle mozaic as it develops, keep abreast of research at Entrez PubMed or Medline etc. online journals, and compare original research results with what EPA and NIH are saying and how they translate this into policy recommendations. Another journal with some interesting relavence is Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
One of the biggest concerns I have is that to escape the known toxics DBP's from chlorination, many communities are getting on the chloramine bandwagon despite the fact that the health effects and toxics BP's are poorly known.
Water policy should evolve towards removing undesirable substances rather than replacing them with toxics and perhaps we should regard water in a more sacred light like our distant ancestors did rather than regarding it as a good hiding place for our excrement and toxic wastes and pesticide residues. Sacred springs were places of worship to the ancient Celts and Norse. What was so wrong with Grannies old Rain Barrel anyway?
How exactly did we, and the millions of other species, survive hundreds of millions of years of evolution without chlorinating our drinking water?
One of my greatest joys is hiking in the mountains is stooping to drink from a spring gushing forth from the base of a scree slope. To know how terrible city water is, one only has to do this once. There is no greater gift that nature has to offer than clean water. It is the stuff of life itself. You see, our bodies are filters of all that passes through. We best be careful not to clog those pores with the crud of human neglect. Know your water, care for it and respect it, and don't forget the other creatures' needs as well.
Note: People on kidney dialysis are at special risk from chloramination and so are aquaculture activities. Chloramines must be removed from water used in kidney dialysis, and medical authorities and patients should be informed of the presence of chloramines and chloramines must be removed from water used by kidney patients. Infants are at risk because some of these substances have been found in mothers breast milk and this may represent a concentration and this should be determined. See my archive article milkcarcinogens.html.
© 2002 Jorma Jyrkkanen.
That is the Question.
http://www.geocities.com/jormabio/archi
THM’s; Trihalomethanes; Chlorination By-Products (CBP's)
1,2-dichloroethane, see link http://193.51.164.11/htdocs/monogra
dichloromethane (side issue; solvent residue of decaffienated coffee)
chloroform(trichloromethane) CHCl3
bromoform CHBr3
bromodichloromethane CHCl2Br
dibromochloromethane CHClBr2
They are Cancer Group B carcinogens (shown to cause cancer in laboratory animals.
Trichloromethane (chloroform) is by far the most common in most water systems. Dibromochloromethane is the most serious cancer risk, (0.6 ug/l to cause a 10-6 cancer risk increase) followed in order by Bromoform (4 ug/l), and Chloroform (6 ug/l). Current regulations limit the concentration of these 4 chemicals added together (total trihalomethane or TTHM levels) to 100 ug/l.
Kenneth P. Cantor et.al. Dec 1987 JNCI [ found that people who drank 8 cups of chlorinated tap water for 40-59 years had a 40% greater risk of bladder cancer than those who drank less tap water or unchlorinated water. People who drank 8 cups of chlorinated tap water for 60 or more years had an 80% greater risk of bladder cancer]
[Q. What about levels of solvent residues in coffee - are there laws about this? Under EU law, dicloromethane residue levels in decaffeinated coffee must be under 2 parts per million. For ethyl acetate and carbon dioxide there are no legislative restrictions in most countries.]
One way to decrease THM's is to eliminate or reduce chlorination before the filters and to reduce precursors. There are more precursors present before filtration, so we want to reduce or eliminate the time chlorine is in contact with this water.
If some oxidation before filtration is required, an alternative disinfectant like potassium permanganate or peroxide could be considered. Note that this may not be an option if prechlorination is necessary to achieve required CT values.
The EPA has indicated that the best available technology for THM control at treatment plants is removal of precursors through "enhanced coagulation".
Enhanced coagulation refers to the process of optimizing the filtration process to maximize removal of precursors.
Removal is improved by decreasing pH (to levels as low as 4 or 5), increasing the feed rate of coagulants, and possibly using ferric coagulants instead of alum.
For point of use systems at homes, activated carbon filters are the most effective treatment. Reverse osmosis units will also eliminate trihalomethanes.
HAA CBP's; Haloacetic acids;
monobromoacetic acid
dibromoacetic acid
monochloroacetic acid
dichloroacetic acid
trichloroacetic acid
Bromates; Ozonation Disinfection By-Products (DBP's)
Ozonation, is expensive and in salty water can produce other carcinogens, bromates. Treatment with ozone causes few DBPs but does result in the production of bromate when used in water with high bromine concentrations. Bromate has been shown in studies by the EPA to cause mesotheliomas in rats and kidney tumors in both rats and mice. In addition, oral exposures to potassium bromate have been shown to cause renal cancer in rats.
Chloramination; and DBP's
Or some combine chlorine withammonia in a disinfection method called chloramination.
Chloramines are composed of three chemicals formed when chlorine and ammonia-nitrogen are combined in water. In high doses chloramines cause blood and liver damage in laboratory animals. Monochloramine is preferred because of its biocidal properties and minimal taste and odor. Monochloramine is created by controlling the chlorine-to-ammonia ratio to a value generally less than 5:1 by weight or 1:1 on a molar basis.
The Chloramines are:
monochloramine (NH2Cl)
dichloramine (NHCl2)
trichloramine, nitrogen trichloride (NCl3).
Chloramination DBP's Summary; definitely some toxins, carcinogens
Nitrification
Blue-green algal blooms, if water temps high
Chloramines also have been found to produce total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
bromodichloromethane
chlorodibromomethane
bromoform
dihaloacetic acids poorly controlled under some conditions (HAAs).
dichloroacetic acid causes cancer in rodents
dissolved organic halogen poorly controlled under some conditions
Research results imply that many unreported DBPs are created by chloramines.
two-step microbial process, ammonia is converted to nitrite and then to nitrate. The intermediate stage-nitrite--depletes the chloramine residual and increases heterotrophic bacteria.
nitrite
nitrate (two-headed fish in hatcheries)
haloacetonitriles
mutagen X, (MX)
Impending Regulations
The EPA is considering extensive revisions to the regulations covering disinfection by-products (DBP's).
The limit for TTHM's would be lowered to 80 ug/l, and three additional categories of DBP's . This standard will replace the current standard of a maximum allowable annual average level of 100 parts per billion in December 2001 for large surface water public water systems. [Canada uses 100 ppb]. The standard will become effective for the first time in December 2003 for small surface water and all ground water systems.
An MCL for total haloacetic acids of 60 ug/l is expected. Potential nervous system and liver effects.
Chlorite is to be regulated with an MCL set at 1 mg/l (1 ppm). Excessive levels linked to hemolytic anemia.
Bromate, the other newly regulated DBP , is a concern only for systems using ozone. An MCL of 10 ug/l is expected. Excessive levels causes gastrointestinal, kidney, and hearing effects.
Data Gaps….I haven't had time to fill these. Busy with life.
Reproductive toxicity.
Robert Chapin, a reproductive toxicologist in the Laboratory of Toxicology, is responsible for studies on 10 compounds identified as high priorities by the EPA: the THMs bromodichloromethane and chlorodibromomethane; the HAAs bromochloroacetic acid, dibromochloroacetic acid, and tribromoacetic acid; the haloacetonitriles bromoacetonitrile and dibromoacetonitrile; hexachloropropanone (a member of a lesser class of DBPs called the haloketones); sodium bromate; and a mixture of mono-, di-, and trichloroacetic acids, mono- and dibromoacetic acids, and bromochloroacetic acid (all HAAs). Long-term rodent carcinogenicity studies are being developed for six compounds under Boorman and one compound (MX)
H2O Treatment LINKS
http://www.awwarf.com/research/apps/chl
http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2
Terminology used in water management and treatment link.
http://wilkes.edu/~eqc/glossary.htm
Water Quality Table link
http://www.eastgr.org/ccrtable.htm
For a neat regulatory package check this link. We Pay $16.95 to see Canadian guidelines; Indonesia=FREE!
Water Purity Regulation in Indonesia; Transparancy
Pesticides in Drinking Water
Violations in the USA
http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/wot/howsafe.ht
Calculating Maximum Pesticide Levels in Drinking Water
EPA table of Maximum Concentrations of Organic Chemicals in Drinking Water
My Conclusion
I am leaning towards reverse osmosis or activated charcoal or untreated pure water from a known tested healthy source like rain or a mountain spring. These may not be fool-proof either. One has to know their water.
Some countries fluoridate their water purportedly to provide drinkers with better teeth. I would expect fluoride to behave like these other halogens, chlorine and bromine, and generate a similar class of carcinogens and related byproducts. The reader should search the literature if they are curious about this. I have heard that fluoridation in the USA causes 10,000 additional cancer deaths per year. I do not recall the reference. Over-dosing is very likely for diebetics who drink large volumes of water and they are at special risk if it is added to the water. Fluoride is present in a balanced diet so one has to wonder why the health authorities wouldn't rather simply promote a balanced diet rather than fluoridate the water.
To sort through the health effects puzzle mozaic as it develops, keep abreast of research at Entrez PubMed or Medline etc. online journals, and compare original research results with what EPA and NIH are saying and how they translate this into policy recommendations. Another journal with some interesting relavence is Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
One of the biggest concerns I have is that to escape the known toxics DBP's from chlorination, many communities are getting on the chloramine bandwagon despite the fact that the health effects and toxics BP's are poorly known.
Water policy should evolve towards removing undesirable substances rather than replacing them with toxics and perhaps we should regard water in a more sacred light like our distant ancestors did rather than regarding it as a good hiding place for our excrement and toxic wastes and pesticide residues. Sacred springs were places of worship to the ancient Celts and Norse. What was so wrong with Grannies old Rain Barrel anyway?
How exactly did we, and the millions of other species, survive hundreds of millions of years of evolution without chlorinating our drinking water?
One of my greatest joys is hiking in the mountains is stooping to drink from a spring gushing forth from the base of a scree slope. To know how terrible city water is, one only has to do this once. There is no greater gift that nature has to offer than clean water. It is the stuff of life itself. You see, our bodies are filters of all that passes through. We best be careful not to clog those pores with the crud of human neglect. Know your water, care for it and respect it, and don't forget the other creatures' needs as well.
Note: People on kidney dialysis are at special risk from chloramination and so are aquaculture activities. Chloramines must be removed from water used in kidney dialysis, and medical authorities and patients should be informed of the presence of chloramines and chloramines must be removed from water used by kidney patients. Infants are at risk because some of these substances have been found in mothers breast milk and this may represent a concentration and this should be determined. See my archive article milkcarcinogens.html.
© 2002 Jorma Jyrkkanen.


Comments
Now over 1,850 professionals urge Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted, citing scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. See statement: http://www.fluorideaction.org/state
Since the first FAN statement, the following has occurred:
-- The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Canada’s leading voice on environmental health issues, released a statement opposing fluoridation.
-- The National Kidney Foundation dropped its fluoridation support replacing it with this caution: “Individuals with CKD [Chronic Kidney Disease] should be notified of the potential risk of fluoride exposure.”
-- Researchers reporting in the Oct 6 2007 British Medical Journal indicate that fluoridation was never was proven safe or effective and may be unethical.
-- “A qualitative review of ...studies found a consistent and strong association between the exposure to fluoride and low IQ,” concluded Tang el al., in "Fluoride and Children’s Intelligence: A Meta-analysis” in Biological Trace Element Research (e-published 8/10/08)
-- Scientifc American editors wrote in January 2008, "Some recent studies suggest that over-consumption of fluoride can raise the risks of disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid gland"
-- Dr. A. K. Susheela, a leading fluoride expert, explains in a video why US physicians overlook fluoride as a possible cause of diseases commonly caused by fluoride. http://tinyurl.com/Susheela
-- An expert panel Health Canada commissioned to study the risks of fluoride exposure says the government should cut the recommended amount in drinking water, encourage the use of low-fluoride toothpaste by children and have makers of infant formula reduce levels in their products. The panel recommended reduced fluoride exposure because it was worried children might be getting too much of the chemical.
We all buy spring water to cook with, feed to our pets, brush teeth with, wash our faces daily, etc., etc. All of us believe we should be using our tap water instead of bottled spring water but what are we to do? If you put a bowl of chloraminated water on the counter it will take WEEKS for the chloramine to dissipate from the water. There are equally big issues with filtering chloramine, one being that monochloramine is a crappy disinfectant. (Dichloramine and trichloramine are even crappier.) The World Health Organization says that monochloramine is 2,000 and 100,000 times less effective than chlorine at the inactivation of e.Coli and rotaviruses respectively.
I researched removal of chloramine from tap water and eventually bought a filter device that screwed onto my kitchen sink faucet. It uses a ton of active carbon and also reverse osmosis (which removes the ammonia part of the chloramine molecule). It cost me $355. It replaced my $20 Britta pitcher. 10 months later I got a chronic stomach ache that lasted for 2 weeks before it dawned on me the filtering device might be failing. I discovered, with the particle counter that came with it, that it was now 89% effective. I called the company, who told me it should have lasted a lot longer. Replacing the filters would cost $160, and it would not be 100% effective like it was when I purchased it. I don't know if the filters failed enough for me to have a chemical irritation in my gut to the chloramine or whether the filters were so inundated with bacteria and microorganisms that I had the the stomach from that, but in any case I tossed it and upped my delivery of spring water. I was angry. $355 is a lot of money to me.
Along with organizing in my water district to get rid of chloramine from our municipal water, we are working with grassroots citizens groups in CA, NY, and PA who are also fighting chloramine. Through the internet we are aware of people who are having the same symptoms we all suffer from chloramine's presence in their municipal water- from 22 states, Canada and Scotland. This is one of the incredibly daunting issues about our precious water.
For more information about the symptoms of chloramine exposure in tap water, what we are doing, watch videos of chloramine sufferers in my water district testify to a panel of members of the CDC and EPA (who pooh poohed the whole thing), read newspaper articles about our struggle, scientific articles we have found, and much more, go here: www.vce.org/chloramine.
I am involved with two other elder women in creating a small book about water that will include prayers, rituals to help the water, and facts about water entitled Respect Water, Protect Water. I am supplying the photographs of water for it. Soon there will be a way to purchase it from the www.chloramine.org. We are keeping it as inexpensive as possible so more people can afford to get it. We have had very positive feedback so far, which feels really good.
Last night I watched the movie called (I think this is the correct title) FLOW - For the Love of Water. It's an award-winning documentary about the state of water on the planet and what people are doing about it. I highly recommend this film to anyone who has concern about the water. One feels great despair and great hope in this movie- there are horrible -and wonderful - things people are doing around water on the planet. http://flowthefilm.com/